Hébert: Jack Layton’s surge great news for Stephen Harper
June 02, 2010 Chantal Hébert
Once in a blue moon, the political stars align in such a way as to give the federal NDP a bit of an edge over their Liberal rivals.
It is not a frequent occurrence. The last time it happened was in the lead-up to the 1988 free trade election, more than two decades ago.
For a period of months, then-NDP leader Ed Broadbent looked like a prime-minister-in-waiting.
Twenty-two years later, Jack Layton is on the way to matching Broadbent’s feat. His popularity far surpasses that of the NDP. He also towers over Liberal rival Michael Ignatieff in the public opinion polls.
According to a just released Angus Reid poll, an Ignatieff-led Liberal-NDP coalition would lose the next election to the Conservatives while a Layton-led one could secure a majority.
Those are highly hypothetical numbers. But they do reflect a trend. And they suggest that Ignatieff’s strategists are wrong to believe that a coalition with the NDP would trigger an exodus of Liberal supporters to the Conservatives but that they are right to suspect that he lacks the moral authority to take the lead of such a maneuver.
If the past is any indication, all of this is excellent news ...for Stephen Harper and the Conservatives.
In the late eighties, Broadbent’s surging popularity gave the NDP’s pipe dream of entering the major leagues at the expense of the Liberals a big shot of momentum.
The two parties spent the 1988 campaign competing for the anti-free trade vote.
Their divisions facilitated the second Mulroney majority and helped usher in a fundamental change in Canada’s interaction with the United States.
But while the NDP came out of the 1988 vote with more seats than it had ever had, its score still left the party well short of second place. With Broadbent gone in retirement five years later, those gains were wiped out.
In 1993 the NDP did not even win back the dozen seats required to be officially recognized in the House of Commons.
It took more than a decade for the party to recover. Now, it seems that all is in place for a Liberal-NDP rematch along the 1988 battle lines.
On the heels of a stinging defeat in the last election, the Liberals are on the defensive from coast to coast to coast and going nowhere fast in Quebec and in most of Western Canada,
Like then-Liberal leader John Turner, Ignatieff is increasingly seen as a weak leader. To all intents and purposes, his party is stalled in voting intentions.
But then so is the NDP. Despite the uncertain Liberal performance, the party can’t break through a 20 percent glass ceiling nationally. In Quebec, a stand-alone NDP scores just below Harper’s unpopular Conservatives. In Ontario, it runs a distant third.
NDP strategists have apparently concluded that it is time to move in for the kill against a weakened Liberal party. Last weekend, Layton dared Ignatieff to try to force the government to split the budget bill before it is allowed to pass and Harper’s minority regime is allowed to survive.
To position the NDP as the only effective national opposition vehicle to the Conservatives, Layton is drawing new, deeper lines in the Liberal/NDP sand.
As in 1988, the next federal campaign and the potential advent of a Conservative majority could be a watershed for the country.
On this, the NDP and the Liberals are in agreement. But as in the days of the free trade debate it does seem it is all they will agree on between now and the next campaign.
Broadbent’s 1988 campaign was both his finest and his most counter-productive hour. A remake is now in the works.
You know that the Dippers are frothing at the mouth and that it is deja vu all over again.
WFDS
She's right. It's about time the NDP grew up and took their place as the leading left party. The Libs simply muddy the water and it's not like they have a consistent direction anyways.
ReplyDeleteWhat Ms. Hebert seems to glass over was despite the popularity of Ed Broadbent in 1988 on the night of the Free Trade election the Progressive Conservatives lost around 30 seats with the Liberals picking up most of them and the Dippers being reduced in seats from their high water mark set in 1984.
ReplyDeleteFortunately for Mr. Mulroney he had the seats to spare so he kept his majority. Stephen Harper does not enjoy the same luxury.
If the current situation plays out as it did in 1988 the Liberals could very well win the next election and Dippers could be reduced to fighting for official party status again.