Positive, negative or confusing, all is good.
Regarding the Stephen Harpers planning on getting rid of the buck for luck all major parties, including the inept one that cannot get any of its candidates elected, I wrote a piece in favour of it.
I received this reply:
shavluk has left a new comment on your post "3287...Sometimes Our Beloved PM Makes Sense":
Well thats because the biggest FREE LOADERS are of course the conservatives.
They cost Tax payers VOLUMES MORE !!
If they will remove the subsidy
THEN THEY SHOULD REMOVE THE TAX WRITE OFF FOR POLITICAL PARTY CONTRIBUTIONS 'S AS WELL !!
UNLESS YOU ARE JUST A PARTISAN HACK AND HYPOCRITE YOU WILL AGREE WITH ME ???
YES ?? OR NO??
Otherwise you are just talking out your hat ...a deception !!
cheers
Well, ma'am, I don't totally agree with you. I do like the fact that Mr. Harper is going to get rid of the buck for luck but I would like him to raise the amount of money a candidate can raise and spend to infinity.
All though it is counter intuitive, if there are no spending limits politics becomes more democratic.
Case in point: Barack Obama.
Right now, under the current systems at all levels, the deck is stacked in favour of both incumbents and those who are affluent and can afford an unpaid year or three while pursuing office.
WFDS
No comments:
Post a Comment